BCN-04, 05Key points of Britain’s post-Brexit trade plan

335

ZCZC

BCN-04

BRITAIN-EU-BREXIT-TRADE

Key points of Britain’s post-Brexit trade plan

LONDON, July 9, 2018 (BSS/AFP) – The Brexit compromise deal thrashed out
by Theresa May’s cabinet over Britain’s contentious exit from the EU has been
dealt a blow by the resignation of David Davis, the minister in charge of the
process.

Here are the key points of the plan agreed Friday between warring factions
within the cabinet, long divided between those seeking a clean break with the
EU and others wanting to maintain a closer relationship with the bloc.

The proposal says it would avoid checks on the border between Northern
Ireland and Ireland and protect manufacturing supply lines, while fulfilling
domestic promises to end the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice
(ECJ), control migration and allow Britain to establish its own trade policy.

– Common rulebook for goods –

Britain and the EU would maintain a “common rulebook for goods including
agri-food”, with London agreeing in a treaty to “ongoing harmonisation” only
with those EU rules necessary to reduce friction at the border.

It says the plan would smooth trade in agricultural, food and fisheries
products, and protect integrated supply chains and just-in-time processes
that are vital to, for example, the automotive industry.

Britain would expect to play a “strong role” in shaping the international
standards which underpin these rules.

The British parliament would also reserve the right to reject any new
rules, while recognising the “consequences for market access, security
cooperation or the frictionless border”.

Britain would leave the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy and Common
Fisheries Policy.

– Flexibility for services –

Britain would retain regulatory flexibility for its dominant services
sector, “where the potential trading opportunities outside the EU are the
largest”, in return for restricted access to EU markets.

MORE/HR/0952

ZCZC

BCN-05

BRITAIN-EU-BREXIT-TRADE 2 LAST LONDON

It accepts the end to current “passporting” rights allowing British
financial firms to operate freely in the EU, but suggests arrangements “that
preserve the mutual benefits of integrated markets and protect financial
stability”.

– Standards and competition –

Britain would legally commit to a common rulebook on state aid rules, and
establish “cooperative arrangements between regulators” on competition.

Both sides would agree to maintain high regulatory standards for the
environment, climate change, social and employment and consumer protection.

– European Court

The EU and Britain would establish a “joint institutional framework” to
ensure the consistent interpretation of legal agreements between them.

In Britain this could be done by British courts, “with due regard to EU
case law” in the relevant areas, but the ECJ would no longer have
jurisdiction.

Both sides would need to agree a means of resolving disputes, including
through binding independent arbitration.

– Customs arrangements and free trade –

Britain proposes that it would “apply the UK’s tariffs and trade policy
for goods intended for the UK, and the EU’s tariffs and trade policy for
goods intended for the EU”.

This arrangement, which would have to be phased in, would eliminate the
need for customs checks and controls between Britain and the EU, “as if a
combined customs territory”.

This would give Britain the right to control its own tariffs and strike
trade deals with non-EU nations — including “potentially” joining the 11-
nation Trans-Pacific Partnership, the document said.

– Free movement of people –

Britain would end free movement of people from the EU, but proposes
British and EU citizens continue to travel and apply for study and work in
each other’s territories.

– No deal option –

The government restated that it is in interests of both sides to reach an
agreement.

But “given the short period remaining before the necessary conclusion of
negotiations this autumn, we agreed preparations should be stepped up” for a
range of potential outcomes, including that no deal is reached.

BSS/AFP/HR/0955