BFF-17 Spotlight returns to Iran’s nuclear programme

218

ZCZC

BFF-17

UN-IRAN-NUCLEAR-WEAPONRY

Spotlight returns to Iran’s nuclear programme

VIENNA, March 9, 2020 (BSS/AFP) – Tehran’s nuclear programme is back under
the spotlight after the UN’s nuclear watchdog revealed the extent of Iran’s
uranium enrichment drive and reprimanded it for denying access to two
locations.

The revelations may lead to heated exchanges at the International Atomic
Energy Agency’s (IAEA) latest quarterly board of governors meeting which
starts on Monday in Vienna.

– Which limits is Iran breaking? –

Since May 2019, Iran has announced successive breaches of the deal struck
four years earlier with world powers which restricted its nuclear programme
in exchange for sanctions relief.

The breaches were in reaction to US President Donald Trump’s withdrawal
from the agreement in 2018 and reimposition of harsh sanctions on Iran.

The latest announcement came in January, when Iran said it was no longer
bound by any restrictions on its nuclear programme.

An IAEA report issued on 3 March said that the announcement itself did not
lead to any noticeable changes, but also revealed the cumulative effect of
Iran’s previous breaches.

There has been a dramatic increase in Iran’s uranium stockpile, which now
stands at over 1,000 kilogrammes — more than five times the limit fixed in
the deal.

The centrifuges being used for enrichment are also more numerous and more
advanced than foreseen under the deal.

Experts say the latest developments mean Iran’s so-called “breakout time”
(the period needed to acquire the weapons-grade fissile material for a bomb)
may well have fallen to a matter of months.

The 2015 deal was meant to ensure the breakout time was at least a year.

However, diplomats caution that none of the current stockpile is enriched
beyond 4.5 percent, with much of it at a lower level than that.

It would need to be enriched to roughly 90 percent for use in a bomb, not
to mention all the other work required to produce a weapon.

Moreover, the IAEA’s extensive monitoring of Iran’s current nuclear
activities — often cited as an achievement of the 2015 deal — is
continuing.

Iran insists its nuclear programme is purely for civilian ends.

– Why were two inspections refused? –

In a second report the IAEA issued last week it reprimanded Iran for
barring inspections at two sites.

They are among three locations about which the IAEA said it had questions
over “possible undeclared nuclear material and nuclear-related activities”.

However, diplomatic sources say these activities date back to the 2000s and
do not directly relate to Iran’s current programme.

The amounts of material concerned are not significant and the agency’s
queries should not be difficult to answer, diplomats say.

“I’m sure that if they got access to these sites, they wouldn’t find much,”
France’s former ambassador to Tehran Francois Nicoullaud told AFP.

“The IAEA is a technical agency so it has the obligation to clear up this
question,” he added, saying the agency “doesn’t have much room for
manoeuvre”.

Nevertheless Iran reacted sharply, telling the IAEA that it does “not
recognize any allegation on past activities”.

In a subsequent statement Iran said “intelligence services’ fabricated
information… creates no obligation for Iran to consider such requests” and
accused the US and Israel of trying to pressure the watchdog.

Israel has claimed that a trove of information obtained by its intelligence
services contains new detail on a previous Iranian nuclear weapons programme.

– Have there been other tensions? –

In October an IAEA inspector was briefly prevented from leaving Iran after
authorities said she triggered an alarm at the Natanz uranium enrichment
plant.

The IAEA said the incident was “not acceptable”.

The rows over the inspector and the agency’s unanswered questions have
highlighted potential friction between the IAEA and Iran.

At a special IAEA board meeting in November, Iran warned the agency — and
unnamed member states — to avoid “aggrandizing” issues unnecessarily, adding
that this could “have a detrimental effect on ongoing cooperation”. And in a
January move which added to the already strained atmosphere, the European
parties to the 2015 accord — France, Germany and the UK — launched the
deal’s dispute resolution mechanism in protest at Iran’s breaches.

BSS/AFP/FI/1108 hrs