Japan funding for imperial ceremonies sparks rare dissent


TOKYO, Oct 20, 2019 (BSS/AFP) – When it comes to Japan’s royal family,
anti-monarchy sentiment is almost non-existent. But government funding for
two highly symbolic imperial rituals this year has sparked rare dissent.

On October 22, Emperor Naruhito will formally proclaim his enthronement,
which occurred earlier this year after his father’s abdication, and in
November he will perform the sacred Daijosai thanksgiving ritual.

The government is setting aside millions of dollars in funds, in
particular for the sumptuous October event, which will draw dignitaries from
around the world.

But critics say the two ceremonies are effectively religious rites, and
public funding for them violates a constitutionally mandated separation of
state and faith.

“The Daijosai ritual is nothing more than a Shinto ceremony,” the United
Church of Christ in Japan, a leading Protestant group, said in a statement
earlier this year.

Public funding for them “violates the principle of separating politics
from religion… and infringes on freedom of belief”, it added.

The subject touches on the sensitive history of the role of the emperor
during World War II.

Under Japan’s wartime constitution, the emperor was “sacred and
inviolable”, he was supreme commander of the army and navy and was invoked as
a motivating force for Japanese troops on battlefields across Asia.

After Japan’s defeat, some felt the imperial family should be removed
altogether, but instead US-led allied forces stripped the emperor of
political power, enshrining his limited role as a state symbol in the newly
written constitution.

The constitution also stipulates that “the state… shall refrain from
religious education or any other religious activity”, a rule critics say the
government will violate by allotting public money to this year’s imperial

– ‘Highly religious nature’ –

The dissent extends beyond the Christian community, with 300 plaintiffs
ranging from Buddhist monks to university professors filing suits from last
year against the government’s plan to fund the ceremonies.

“The government funding these religious events means that the emperor
epitomises Japan’s religion and culture, and that the government is promoting
a state religion,” Koichi Shin, one of the plaintiffs, told AFP.

“We think it’s a problem, too, that all the activities of the imperial
family are financed with public money,” he added.

“But the two ceremonies are huge in terms of size and expenditure, as well
as media attention, so they have an enormous impact on society.”

And the critics have support from a somewhat unlikely quarter: Crown
Prince Akishino.

Last November, before assuming his new title with his brother’s ascension
to the throne, he publicly questioned the spending, noting the Daijosai
ceremony in particular “has a highly religious nature”.

“I wonder if it is appropriate to finance this highly religious thing with
state funds,” he said.

The issue has come up before, with lawsuits also filed over the
enthronement of former emperor Akihito and ceremonies related to the death of
his father Hirohito in 1989. But the cases were mostly dismissed.

One court ruled there were grounds to “suspect” the ceremonies were
religious, but the supreme court rejected suits on the grounds that the
ceremonies were “social conventions” not religious activities.

– ‘Social conventions’ –

The government says the rituals are “public events” and therefore eligible
for funding.

And the spending will not be insignificant given the price tag for all the
enthronement-related ceremonies runs to 16 billion yen ($147.2 million).

The government has set aside $64 million in cabinet funds for the events,
with the remainder split between the imperial household — itself funded by
taxpayer money — the national police agency, and the foreign and defence

Several lawsuits against the spending are working their way through the
courts, but none stand much chance.

A hearing on an urgent injunction isn’t even scheduled until after the
Daijosai event.

And there is little sign of public support for the critics, with the
imperial family enjoying high approval ratings.

But the plaintiffs, including Satoshi Ukai, a professor of modern French
literature, are undeterred, insisting Japan’s history makes it important to
fight the case.

“The Japanese case is different from cases in other countries,” he told

“Japan’s state Shintoism… was used as a foundation to justify invasive
wars and colonisations.”