LONDON, March 26, 2019 (BSS/AFP) – Britain’s parliament sought a new Brexit
approach Tuesday after seizing the initiative from Prime Minister Theresa May
in a historic vote taken to stave off a looming “no-deal” divorce.
Lawmakers exasperated by Britain’s failed efforts to split from the
European Union after three years of debates and negotiations voted Monday to
give themselves a broader say on what happens next.
The motion creates parliamentary time for MPs to come up with their own
proposals in place of the ill-loved deal May struck with Brussels at the end
of last year.
The unprecedented measure passed by a 329-302 margin and saw three junior
ministers quit the government to vote against the premier.
Richard Harrington said he resigned as business minister because May’s
course and the resulting impasse had left Britain with “a democratic
deficit”.
Junior foreign minister Alistair Burt said he quit to help the House of
Commons “come to a conclusion for the country’s sake”.
– Starting over –
The measure was backed primarily by europhiles who want to either reverse
Brexit or preserve much closer economic ties with the remaining 27 EU states.
They represent the views of roughly half the voters in a deeply divided
that is still coming to terms with the outcome of the 2016 Brexit vote.
No one is entirely sure how parliament will approach its new role in the
week the 46-year partnership was scheduled to have ended.
EU leaders pushed back Brexit day to April 12 after meeting May in
Brussels last week and deciding that Britain still did not know what it
wanted to do.
The proposed agenda submitted to parliament Tuesday would see MPs first
pick through an array of choices on Wednesday.
“We may then change the system for next week as we are trying to narrow it
down,” co-sponsor Hilary Benn told BBC radio.
The biggest worry for May is a mooted plan for parliament in the following
days to take an even firmer grip of the Brexit agenda by passing legislation
that forces the government’s hand.
Parliament’s initial votes will be non-binding instructions that only
carry political weight.
May has already signalled that she might ignore them if they contradict
her Conservative party’s 2017 election platform.
It included a vow to take Britain out of the EU customs union and single
market — the two vast organisations that open borders and regulate trade
across most of the European continent.
But Burt said he resigned precisely because he felt that the “government
should adopt any feasible outcome as its own in order to progress matters”.
– ‘Better than not leaving’ –
Parliament is now effectively re-considering how to go about Brexit all
over again.
Everything is back on the table and May’s deal — twice resoundingly
rejected by lawmakers this year — is just one of a half-dozen or so
approaches that may be up for debate.
May herself admitted “with great regret” Monday that there was “still not
sufficient support in the House to bring back the deal for a third meaningful
vote”.
Her efforts to bring onside anti-EU rebels in her own party have been
fruitless despite months of talks.
But there are some hints that the current political shift could be scaring
some of the rebels into line.
Brexit hardliner Jacob Rees-Mogg — who heads the ultra-conservative
European Research Group (ERG) group in May’s party — conceded on a political
podcast on Tuesday that “Mrs May’s deal is better than not leaving at all”.
“Securing the backing of a high profile ERG member like Rees-Mogg —
albeit reluctantly — could dramatically improve May’s numbers,” said Oanda
trading house analyst Craig Erlam.
“It’s now just a question of whether it’s too little too late.”
But Northern Ireland’s Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) that supports May
in parliament continues to oppose the agreement.
It remains unclear when — or even if — May will bring it back for a vote
although the government has hinted this could happen on Thursday.
Britain would leave the EU on May 22 if parliament passes May’s original
agreement.