BCN-24,25 China approves foreign investment law, possible US olive branch

308

ZCZC

BCN-24

CHINA-TRADE-INVESTMENTS-LEAD

China approves foreign investment law, possible US olive branch

BEIJING, March 15, 2019 (BSS/AFP) – China’s rubber-stamp parliament
approved Friday a foreign investment law that may serve as an olive branch in
trade talks with the United States, but it received a lukewarm welcome from
business groups.

The legislation aims to address long-running grievances from foreign firms
including stronger protections for intellectual property, but the US and
European chambers of commerce voiced concerns that they were not given enough
time to give their input.

The National People’s Congress voted 2,929 in favour of the law — with
eight against and eight abstentions — barely three months after a first
draft was debated, an unusually quick turnaround for the legislature, which
meets once a year.

The move comes as US and Chinese negotiators hold complex talks aimed at
resolving a months-long trade war that has pounded businesses with tariffs on
$360 billion in two-way commerce.

US President Donald Trump said Thursday the negotiations should wrap up
within four weeks, adding: “We are getting what we have to get.”

China’s top trade negotiator, Liu He, held phone talks with US Treasury
Secretary Steven Mnuchin and US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, with
the official Xinhua news agency saying they made “substantial progress”.

The bill will eliminate the requirement for foreign enterprises to transfer
proprietary technology to Chinese joint-venture partners and protect against
“illegal government interference” — major sticking points in the trade
negotiations.

The legislation will come into force on January 1, 2020, according to
Xinhua.
China will also amend its intellectual property law and “introduce a
punitive damages mechanism to ensure that all infringements will be seriously
dealt with”, Chinese Premier Li Keqiang told reporters at the end of the
parliament’s two-week session.

The changes will “ensure violators have no place to hide”, he said.

Under the bill, foreign investors will enjoy the same privileges as Chinese
companies in most sectors, except those placed on “negative lists”, officials
say.

MORE/HR/1412
ZCZC

BCN-25

CHINA-TRADE-INVESTMENTS-LEAD 2 LAST BEIJING

– ‘Small slice’ of concerns –

Li said China will soon announce shorter negative lists and continue to
trim them in future, “increasing the scope of what is not prohibited”.

Tim Stratford, chairman of the American Chamber of Commerce in China, said
“the last minute efforts are appreciated”.

But, he added, the changes “only address a small slice of the overall set
of concerns our members have about the uneven playing field foreign companies
encounter in China”.

The chamber was concerned about vague language in provisions that allowed
local governments to expropriate investments that “harm public interest” and
the inability to appeal against the outcome of national security reviews.

Jacob Parker, Beijing-based vice president at the US-China Business
Council, welcomed the “positive language” in the bill but added that “real
investment on the ground will depend on how narrowly tailored those negative
lists are going forward”.

Kyle Freeman, a lawyer at Dezan Shira & Associates, said businesses will
still need to jump “several hurdles” to gain market access.

“There are continued concerns that the on-the-ground reality of industry-
specific laws, regulations, and local administrative approvals… may impede
full market access at the implementation level despite provisions in the
negative list,” he told AFP.

The European Union Chamber of Commerce in China had earlier complained that
Beijing was rushing the investment law to appease the United States.

The latest revisions of the legislation have yet to be made public.

But a source who saw the latest draft told AFP that it includes a new
article on protecting foreign companies’ commercial secrets.

It also fleshes out criminal penalties for officials who leak confidential
information they obtain from overseas businesses, the source added.

“I think we can safely assume that this language is a result of the trade
negotiations as it was slipped in at the last minute,” Parker said.

BSS/AFP/HR/1415