WASHINGTON, March 30, 2019 (BSS/AFP) – For the past 15 years, America has
sought to put its astronauts back on the Moon, but NASA did not think it
could be done before 2028.
On Tuesday, the government of President Donald Trump set a new deadline:
But that timeframe is anything but ironclad, and would force the US space
agency to upend its usual work practices and take serious risks.
Just a few weeks ago, NASA chief Jim Bridenstine said the United States
was not in any space race.
But he was forced to change his tune when Vice President Mike Pence said
NASA needed to put astronauts back on the Moon in 2024 “by any means
“Make no mistake about it, we are in a space race today,” Pence said.
Bridenstine now says the acceleration of the calendar is “aggressive” but
Industry experts and officials also believe it’s possible, but with a list
of caveats: more money is needed, fewer tests, more help from the private
sector — and some even want a change at the top of NASA.
“I assume that all means that we would need more funding in order to
accomplish those goals,” one lawmaker asked.
“Yes,” said Bridenstine.
– More money, more problems –
The idea of allocating more money to NASA has some on Capitol Hill
gritting their teeth.
The space agency has already spent $23 billion developing its new heavy-
lift rocket (the Space Launch System, which is being built by aerospace giant
Boeing), the Orion capsule to transport the astronauts (built by Lockheed
Martin) and ground installations.
Congress has granted it $4 billion for 2019.
Orion is nearly ready but the SLS is the real bottleneck: it will be more
powerful than the rockets used on the original Apollo missions to the Moon,
but it is years behind schedule.
At a NASA facility in New Orleans, the first stage of the SLS prototype,
expected to take flight next year, is still being assembled.
But its four engines have not yet been delivered.
That first stage is then meant to be transported via barge to St Louis for
testing, before being sent to Florida for final assembly.
As for the planned June 2020 test flight, Bridenstine said: “I don’t think
that’s in the cards.”
Some of the engine testing could be cancelled to gain a few months.
But that would fly in the face of the long-standing conservative work
culture at NASA, which is still scarred by the Challenger and Columbia space
shuttle disasters in 1986 and 2003.
“Do you want to kill astronauts? Because this is how you kill astronauts,”
said Holly Griffith, a vehicle systems engineer working on the Orion capsule
“There’s no reason to accelerate going to the Moon by four years,”
Griffith told AFP. “It’s ridiculous.”
– Help! –
The reality of Pence’s announcement is that 2024 is politically
significant: it would be the final year in Trump’s eventual second term at
the White House.
“The administration has been frustrated for some time on the lack of
progress on the mandate to return to the Moon,” Greg Autry, the vice
president for space development at the independent National Space Society,
“It’s clear the president wants it to happen during his second term,
presuming he’s re-elected,” added Autry, who was a member of Trump’s
presidential transition team.
So why has a return to the Moon taken so long — after all, Neil Armstrong
made his legendary “giant leap for mankind” 50 years ago.
Autry says NASA wants to be “100,000 percent sure this will be safe.”
He says a “culture change” is needed, along with the naming of new top
brass at the space agency who are “more like the president” and come from the
Technically, the new mission is markedly different from the Apollo
This time around, the Americans are not simply looking to plant the Stars
and Stripes, but also to create a lasting infrastructure over the course of
several trips, both in orbit and on the lunar surface.
Also on the agenda is learning to extract frozen water from the Moon.
Uncrewed missions would take place to build the Lunar Gateway in the vicinity
of the Moon and deliver equipment.
All of the above would be in preparation for eventual missions to Mars.
The other new element is that NASA wants to land at the Moon’s South Pole,
where the water has been detected, as opposed to its equator, where the
Apollo missions landed.
“We’re not starting from scratch,” says Marshall Smith, who manages
proposals at NASA for the future lunar lander, which will ferry astronauts
back and forth from the station to the Moon.
But “it’s going to be a challenge,” he admits — there is not even a
design yet for the lander.
For 2024 to become a reality, NASA will need to rely heavily on private
space companies, which are far more developed than they were in the 1960s and
will be called upon like never before.
The shorter timetable “may require them to partner a lot more with
industry,” said Thomas Orlando, the director of a NASA research center at